An empirical view on raising to subject

Autor/innen

  • Scott Grimm

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.52.2010.384

Abstract

This paper employs empirical methods to examine verbs such as seem, for which the traditional raising to subject analysis relates pairs of sentences which differ by taking an infinitival or sentential complement. A corpus-driven investigation of the verbs seem and appear demonstrates that information structure and evidentiality both play a determinate role in the choice between infinitival or sentential complementation. The second half of the paper builds upon the corpus results and examines the implications for the standard claims concerning these constructions. First, pairs of sentences related by the subject-to-subject raising analysis of verbs are often viewed as equivalent. New evidence from indefinite generic subjects shows that whether an indefinite generic subject occurs in the infinitival or sentential complement construction leads to truth-conditional differences. Further implications are explored for the claim that subjects of the infinitival variant may take narrow-scope: once various confounds are controlled for, the subject of the infinitival construction is shown to most naturally take wide-scope.

 

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2010

Zitationsvorschlag

Grimm, Scott. 2010. „An Empirical View on Raising to Subject“. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 52 (Januar):83-109. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.52.2010.384.