Towards a typology of complement control

Autor/innen

  • Barbara Stiebels

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.47.2007.344

Abstract

It is the aim of this paper to evaluate the various types of sentential complementation available in terms of complement control cross-linguistically. I will propose a lexical classification of control classes on the basis of the instantiated subordination patterns. I want to focus on an important distinction, namely that of structural vs. inherent control. Structural control is found with predicates that select a clausal complement whose structure requires argument identification and thus 'induces' control. Infinitival complements are prototypical cases for this kind of control because in most languages infinitival complements can only 'survive' in structures of control or raising. The interesting question is which predicates license structural control and which cross-linguistic differences emerge between potential licensors. Inherent control is found with predicates that require control readings independent of the instantiated structure of sentential complementation (e.g. a directive predicate such as zwingen 'force'). In addition, I will recapitulate and add arguments for the dual lexical-syntactic nature of complement control.

 

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2007

Zitationsvorschlag

Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. „Towards a Typology of Complement Control“. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47 (Januar):1-59. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.47.2007.344.