Specifics

Autor/innen

  • Bart Geurts

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.24.2001.132

Abstract

In all these examples there appears to be mismatch between the position at which an indefinite appears and its preferred interpretation. Following many of the more recent contributions to the literature, I will assume that this is the hallmark of specificity (e.g. Ahusch 1994, Reinhart 1997, Winter 1997, van Geenhoven 1998). Such mismatches are not the norm: indefinites are often interpreted in situ, and there is some reason for taking this to be the default option. The reason is that comparatively 'neutral', i.e. semantically attenuate, indefinites have a preference for in situ readings [...].

 

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2001

Zitationsvorschlag

Geurts, Bart. 2001. „Specifics“. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 24 (Januar):191-214. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.24.2001.132.